Appeal No. 1996-1716 Application No. 08/344,532 ordinary usage, we find that “major amount” means an amount that is “greater in number, quantity, or extent.”5 All of the examples in the originally filed disclosure (see pages 18-22 and 24-28) show the epoxy resin component in an amount that is greater than any other component (either in parts, weight %, or volume %). Accordingly, we determine that this originally filed disclosure conveys with reasonable clarity to those of ordinary skill in the art that appellant, as of the filing date, was in possession of the invention as now claimed, i.e., that the epoxy resin component was present in the adhesive composition in a “major amount.” For the foregoing reasons, the rejection of claims 1-4 and 7 under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is reversed. B. The Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 As admitted by the examiner, the primary references (Koleske, Blount, and Tominaga) do not recite the particular alkyl-substituted dicarboxylic acid reactant that forms the polyester of appealed claim 1 (Answer, page 4, see the Brief, See Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, p.5 1363, G. & C. Merriam Company, Springfield, Mass., 1971. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007