Appeal No. 1996-1783 Application No. 08/195,025 sufficiency of appellants’ rebuttal evidence (page 25 of the specification; see the Brief, page 19, and the Reply Brief, pages 5-6). In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688, 2 USPQ2d 1276, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the examiner’s rejection of claims 20 through 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Meybeck or Fujiwara or Handjani in view of Tin and/or Popescu and Gaonkar is reversed. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED CHARLES F. WARREN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) CAROL A. SPIEGEL ) Administrative Patent Judge ) TAW:svt 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007