Appeal No. 96-1790
Application No. 08/285,375
1992). Based on the totality of the record, we determine that
the preponderance of evidence weighs in favor of obviousness
of the subject matter recited in appealed claim 1.
Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1 through 11 under § 103
over Chung in view of Green and Watanabe is affirmed.
Similarly, the rejection of claims 1-7 and 10-12 under § 103
over Hongo in view of Green and Watanabe is affirmed.
Therefore the decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
JOHN D. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007