THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HERBERT EICHENAUER,
KARL-HEINZ OTT, DIETER WITTMANN
and ALFRED PISCHTSCHAN
____________
Appeal No. 96-1795
Application No. 08/262,7451
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 16, which are
the only claims in this application.
1Application for patent filed June 20, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
08/052,591, filed April 26, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007