Ex parte VELLUTATO - Page 3


                     Appeal No. 1996-1801                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/142,049                                                                                                                                            

                                The examiner has rejected appealed claims 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 13, 16, 17 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. §                                                           
                     103 as being unpatentable over Falciani in view of Anthony and Bacehowski.  The                                                                                   
                     examiner has also rejected appealed claims 14 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                                                                  
                     over Falciani in view of Anthony and Bacehowski as applied to claim 13, and further in view of                                                                    
                     Pomerantz and Anderson.  We affirm.                                                                                                                               
                                Rather than reiterate the respective positions advanced by the examiner and appellant, we refer                                                        
                     to the examiner’s answer and to appellant’s brief for a complete exposition thereof.                                                                              
                                                                                     Opinion                                                                                           
                                We have carefully reviewed the record on this appeal and based thereon find ourselves in                                                               
                     agreement with the examiner that the claimed sterilization method encompassed by appealed claim 1                                                                 
                     would have been obvious over the combined teachings of Falciani, Anthony and Bacehowski, and that                                                                 
                     the claimed sterilization method encompassed by appealed claim 14 would have been obvious over the                                                                
                     combined teachings of Falciani, Anthony, Bacehowski, Pomerantz and Anderson, to one of ordinary                                                                   
                     skill in this art at the time the claimed invention was made.  We agree with the position advanced on                                                             
                     appeal by the examiner, including the response to appellant’s arguments in the brief, adding the                                                                  
                     following for emphasis.                                                                                                                                           
                                We find from the combined teachings of Falciani, Anthony and Bacehowski that it was known                                                              
                     in the art to employ a multi-enclosure package, which can be inserted into a shipping package, to                                                                 
                     maintain the sterility of various biological materials under various levels of contamination, wherein the                                                         
                     various enclosures surrounding such materials can be peeled away as necessary to maintain the desired                                                             
                     level of sterilization of the surface of the presented outer enclosure of the package in the area in which                                                        
                     the package is to be placed.  See, e.g., Bacehowski, col. 7, lines 17-33.  Each of Falciani, Anthony                                                              
                     and Bacehowski utilize gamma radiation to sterilize a multi-enclosure package, with only Bacehowski                                                               
                     performing the sterilization step prior to filing the multi-layer container 10 with a biological solution (col.                                                   
                     6, lines 46-49).  In Falciani, the pharmaceutical product was sterilized via “ã-rays” “in bag 1” which                                                            
                     was hermetically sealed (col. 2, lines 41-44; emphasis supplied), prior to insertion of “bag 1” into                                                              
                     further hermetically sealed enclosures and encasing the resulting multi-enclosure package for shipping                                                            

                                                                                        - 3 -                                                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007