Appeal No. 96-1842
Application 08/193,356
obviousness of independent claims 1, 5 and 9. Accordingly,
the rejection of claims 1-11 as unpatentable over the
teachings of Berry is not sustained.
In conclusion, we have not sustained either of the
examiner’s rejections of the claims. Therefore, the decision
of the examiner rejecting claims 1-11 is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
Garrett & Dunner
1300 I Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005-3315
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007