THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOSE L. RIVERA,
WILLIAM L. RODMAN,
DONALD B. SPENCER
and BRIAN P. STAPLETON
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1869
Application 08/086,4941
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, STAAB and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 16. These claims constitute all of the claims in the
application.2
1Application for patent filed July 1, 1993.
2In error, the examiner states (answer, page 2) that the copy of the claims in
the brief is correct. Contrary to the claims of record, the copy of claim 1 specifies
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007