Appeal No. 96-1869 Application 08/086,494 Miles disclosures as regards the lack of a teaching of or suggestion for the claimed feature of a slot element having a cavity comprising a housing for a glide slope antenna and a volume of an aircraft landing gear door. Thus, the rejection of independent claims 3 and 11, and claims dependent therefrom, must be reversed. The rejection of claims 1 and 2 is also reversed. Independent claim 1 requires, inter alia, a glide slope antenna disposed “on” the leading edge of a nose gear door, and an electromagnetic window for coupling radio frequency energy “into” the nose gear door. Simply stated, the collective teachings of Stapleton, Noble, Miles, and Young, would not have suggested a glide slope antenna disposed “on” the leading edge of a nose gear door, and an electromagnetic window for coupling radio frequency energy “into” the nose gear door, as claimed. The rejection of independent claims 9, 10, and 16 is reversed for the procedural reason that follows. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007