Ex parte KUTA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 96-1890                                                          
          Application No. 08/111,176                                                  

          of the artisan to do so.  The examiner has provided us with no              
          such suggestion for providing a “uniform and continuous”                    
          direction of magnetic polarization, as claimed.  Accordingly,               
          the examiner has not established a prima facie case of                      
          obviousness.                                                                
               The references to Moeller and Keidl do not provide for                 
          the deficiencies of the principal references noted supra.                   

























                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007