THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 46
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GEORGES BOUSSIGNAC
and JEAN-CLAUDE LABRUNE
__________
Appeal No. 96-1902
Application 08/156,6791
__________
HEARD: Jan. 12, 1999
__________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed November 22, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/963,002, filed October 19, 1992, abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/750,232, filed
August 20, 1991, abandoned; which is a continuation of
Application 07/419,690, filed October 11, 1989, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007