Ex parte BOUSSIGNAC et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1902                                                          
          Application No. 08/156,679                                                  


               Georges Boussignac and Jean-Claude Labrune (the                        
          appellants) appeal from the final rejection of claims 11-13,                
          15 and 16, the only claims remaining in the application.                    
               We AFFIRM.                                                             
               The appellants' invention pertains to a respiratory                    
          assistance device.  Independent claim 11 is further                         
          illustrative of the appealed subject matter and a copy thereof              
          may be found in EXHIBIT A of the brief.                                     
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Baum et al. (Baum '530) 4,270,530                      Jun. 02,             
          1981                                                                        
          McGrail                  4,584,998                     Apr. 29,             
          1986                                                                        
          Weerda et al. (Weerda)   4,630,606                     Dec. 23,             
          1986                                                                        
          Brown                    4,813,431                     Mar. 21,             
          1989                                                                        
          Baum (Baum '896)         2 114 896                     Sep. 01,             
          1983                                                                        
          (Great Britain)                                                             
               Claims 11-13, 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 112, first paragraph, as being based upon an original                     
          disclosure which fails to provide descriptive support for the               
          subject matter now being claimed.                                           



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007