THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EDWARD J. DALGEWICZ, III,
JOHN BOND and
RICHARD FREUNDLICH
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1971
Application 07/914,3881
______________
HEARD: JULY 15, 1999
_______________
Before CAROFF, JOHN D. SMITH and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed July 17, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/903,076, filed June 22, 1992, now abandoned; which is a continuation-
in-part of Application 07/863,204, filed April 3, 1992; which is a continuation of Application
07/829,478, filed February 3, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007