Ex parte TODA et al. - Page 3




             Appeal No. 96-2168                                                                                   
             Application No. 08/257,478                                                                           


             supply is converted into an AC voltage, which is applied to                                          
             rotate rotors of the motors; chopping signal generating means                                        
             for generating chopping signals each having a predetermined                                          
             period for combining with respective drive signals for                                               
             selectively driving means of the respective drive means, the                                         
             chopping signals having a higher frequency than that of the                                          
             drive signals; wherein respective chopping signals and drive                                         
             signals are output by the microcomputer to the respective                                            
             drive means to convert the DC voltage to an AC voltage and to                                        
             effect voltage chopping, and the chopped AC voltage is applied                                       
             to respective motors to control the rotation frequency of                                            
             rotors of the motors.                                                                                
                          The Examiner relies on the following references:                                        
             Karlin et al. (Karlin)                  3,600,655                  Aug. 17, 1971                     
             Nam                                     5,210,684                  May  11, 1993                     
                                                                   (filed Dec. 18, 1991)                          
             Yamaguchi et al. (Yamaguchi)                   5,373,436                  Dec. 13,                   
             1994                                                                                                 
                                                                   (filed June 30, 1992)                          
                          Claims 1 through 3, 6, 13, 16 and 17 stand rejected                                     
             under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Karlin and                                          
             Yamaguchi.  Claims 4, 5 and 7 through 12 stand rejected under                                        
             35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Karlin and                                                
             Yamaguchi in view of Nam.  Claims 14 and 15 stand rejected                                           
             under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and being anticipated by Karlin.                                               
                          Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants                                       
             and the Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer                                          
             for the respective details thereof.                                                                  

                                                       -3-3                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007