Appeal No. 96-2181
Application No. 07/963,440
16, 1993 (filed Jan. 22,
1991)
Claims 1, 3 through 5, 7 through 13, 16 and 17 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Wright in view of Blaeser, Hinlein and Erpelding. Claim 6
stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Wright, Hinlein and Erpelding in view of Foote. Claims
19 through 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Wright, Blaeser, Hinlein and Hsu. Claims 26
through 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Wright, Blaeser, Hinlein and Hsu in view of
McAllister.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants
and the Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer
for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 3
through 13, 16, 17 and 19 through 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The Examiner has failed to set forth a prima facie
-5-5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007