Ex parte BERG et al. - Page 10

                 Appeal No. 96-2181                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 07/963,440                                                                                                             


                 dependent claims 12, 13, 16, 17 and 20 through 28.                                                                                     












                                  We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1, 3                                                                   
                 through 13, 16, 17 and 19 through 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                                            
                 Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed.2                                                                                     


                                                                   REVERSED                                                                             



                                                     John C. Martin                                        )                                            
                                                     Administrative Patent Judge )                                                                      
                                                                                                  )                                                     
                                                                                                  )                                                     
                                                                                                  ) BOARD OF                                            
                 PATENT                                                                           )                                                     

                          2We note that there is no antecedent for “said 9 head                                                                         
                 arm suspension assemblies” recited in claim 16.                                                                                        

                                                                        -10-10                                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007