THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KATSUMI OISHI
________________
Appeal No. 96-2190
Application 08/287,7581
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KRASS, HECKER and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 14, all of the claims in the case.
The disclosed invention relates to a time recorder which
1Application for patent filed August 9, 1994. According
to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
07/985,783, filed December 4, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007