Ex parte CAMERON - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-2199                                                        
          Application 08/191,060                                                      



               a temperature measuring circuit connected to said                      
          temperature sensing element and to said commutation                         
          controller, for causing the commutation controller to operate               
          at the second frequency responsive to the temperature of the                
          substrate exceeding a first threshold temperature and for                   
          subsequently causing the commutation controller to operate at               
          the first frequency responsive to the temperature of the                    
          substrate falling below a second threshold temperature, the                 
          second threshold temperature being lower than the first                     
          threshold temperature.                                                      

          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Ohi                       5,296,789            Mar. 22, 1994                
          (effectively filed May 17, 1991)                                            
          Claims 1, 2, 4-11, 13, 15-21, 23, 24 and 26-29 stand                        
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness                 
          the examiner offers Ohi taken alone.  A rejection of claim 27               
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112 has been withdrawn [answer, page 5].                  
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for                
          the respective details thereof.                                             
                                                                                     
                    OPINION                                                           
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the                      
          evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support              
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007