Ex parte CAMERON - Page 13




          Appeal No. 1996-2199                                                        
          Application 08/191,060                                                      



          rejection of claims 24 and 27 for reasons discussed above with              
          respect to these other claims.                                              
          Claim 26 is argued separately by appellant.  This                           
          claim recites features which we have considered above with                  
          respect to other claims.  We sustain the rejection of claims                
          26 for reasons discussed above with respect to these other                  
          claims.                                                                     
          In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection                      
          of the claims with respect to claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8-11, 13, 15-               
          17, 19-21, 23, 24 and 26-29, but we have not sustained the                  
          rejection with respect to claims 7 and 18.  Therefore, the                  
          decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 4-11, 13, 15-               
          21, 23, 24 and 26-29 is affirmed-in-part.                                   
          No time period for taking any subsequent action in                          
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 
          AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                                            






                                          13                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007