Appeal No. 1996-2199 Application 08/191,060 rejection of claims 24 and 27 for reasons discussed above with respect to these other claims. Claim 26 is argued separately by appellant. This claim recites features which we have considered above with respect to other claims. We sustain the rejection of claims 26 for reasons discussed above with respect to these other claims. In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection of the claims with respect to claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8-11, 13, 15- 17, 19-21, 23, 24 and 26-29, but we have not sustained the rejection with respect to claims 7 and 18. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 4-11, 13, 15- 21, 23, 24 and 26-29 is affirmed-in-part. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART 13Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007