THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAMLESH GAGLANI
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2239
Application No. 08/037,4851
____________
HEARD: November 18, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 15 and 17 through
1Application for patent filed March 24, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/821,240, filed January 10, 1992, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/418,294, filed October 6, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007