THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte JOHANNES H.N. GIJRATH
__________________
Appeal No. 96-2276
Application 08/128,6221
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before BARRETT, LEE, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 13-24. Claims 1-12
have been canceled.
References relied on by the Examiner
Ragland, Jr. (Ragland) Patent 4,437,036 Mar. 13, 1984
Morrell Patent 4,146,816 Mar. 27, 1979
The Rejections on Appeal
1
Application for patent filed September 28, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007