Ex parte THIRUVENGADAM et al. - Page 1







                          THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                            

             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                       
             was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                                          
             not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                  

                                                                                Paper No. 18                      


                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                  __________                                                      

                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                  __________                                                      

              Ex parte TIRUVETTIPURAM K. THIRUVENGADAM, CHOU-HONG TANN,                                           
              JUNNING LEE, TIMOTHY MCALLISTER, CESAR COLON,                                                       
                   DEREK H. R. BARTON, RONALD BRESLOW and ANANTHA SUDHAKAR                                        
                                                  __________                                                      

                                           Appeal No. 1996-2308                                                   
                                         Application 08/179,0081                                                  
                                                 ___________                                                      

                                                   ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                 ___________                                                      


             Before PAK, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          

             OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    

                    This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of                                      




                    1  Application for patent filed January 7, 1994.  According to the appellant, the             
             application is a division of Application 07/962,768, filed October 19, 1992; which is a              
             continuation-in-part of Application PCT/US92/05972, filed July 21, 1992, which is a                  
             continuation-in-part of Application 07/734,652, filed July 23, 1991, now abandoned;                  
             which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/734,426, filed July 23, 1991, now                  
             abandoned.                                                                                           

                                                        1                                                         







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007