THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TIRUVETTIPURAM K. THIRUVENGADAM, CHOU-HONG TANN,
JUNNING LEE, TIMOTHY MCALLISTER, CESAR COLON,
DEREK H. R. BARTON, RONALD BRESLOW and ANANTHA SUDHAKAR
__________
Appeal No. 1996-2308
Application 08/179,0081
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before PAK, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
1 Application for patent filed January 7, 1994. According to the appellant, the
application is a division of Application 07/962,768, filed October 19, 1992; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application PCT/US92/05972, filed July 21, 1992, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/734,652, filed July 23, 1991, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/734,426, filed July 23, 1991, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007