Appeal No. 1996-2357 Application 08/124,617 containing any of these species. We therefore reverse on the merits the rejection of claims 4, 7 and 8 over Bögemann, alone or with Fujii. Rejections over Boustany or Kleiman, each alone or in view of Fujii We need only to address claim 3, which is the only independent claim. Boustany discloses certain alkyl- and cycloalkyl-nitro- benzothiazolyl disulfides as vulcanization accelerators (col. 1, line 43 - col. 2, line 2). The benzothiazolyl radical in these compounds, unlike that in appellants’ compounds, is substituted in the 5 or 6 position with a nitro radical. Also, the “R” group in Boustany’s structural formula (col. 1, lines 48-56) is alkyl or cycloalkyl and, therefore, differs from the polar group to the right of the disulfide linkage in the formula in appellants’ claim 3. Kleiman discloses a method for making unsymmetrical organic disulfides (col. 1, lines 8-16). The examiner does not point to any particular compounds in Kleiman as being similar to appellants’ claimed composition. -8-8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007