THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WOLFGANG RITTER
________________
Appeal No. 96-2432
Application No. 08/066,0871
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21-
26 and 28-45. Claims 46-78, the other claims remaining in the
Application for patent filed May 26, 1993. According1
to appellant, this application is a National stage application
under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/EP91/02169, filed November 18,
1991.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007