THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WERNER KUBITZA, ROLF ROSCHU,
FERDINAND ZOLLNER and HANS J. LAAS
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2504
Application 08/318,3281
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and HANLON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 7-
24, all the claims remaining in the present application.
Claim 7 is illustrative:
Application for patent filed October 5, 1994. According to appellants,1
this application is a continuation of application 08/009,522, filed January
27, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007