Appeal No. 96-2518
Application No. 08/040,053
display of a location of a fault which is in the automation
system [brief-page 9] is not understood. Appellant’s
arguments regarding Woods are not relevant to the rejection of
any claims but for claims 6 and 19 and appellant has not
separately argued the merits of these claims.
We have sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 20
under 35 U.S.C. 103 but we have not sustained the rejection of
claims 1 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007