THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GARY A. SIGEL and ROMAN C. DOMSZY
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2575
Application 08/051,8861
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7,
and 9-18, all the claims remaining in the present application.
A copy of illustrative claim 1 is appended to this decision.
The examiner relies upon the following references as
evidence of obviousness:
Application for patent filed April 26, 1993.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007