THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER J. ROGERS and JAMES H. PAGONES
________________
Appeal No. 96-2625
Application 08/329,5361
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 8-12, which are all of the claims remaining in the
1Application for patent filed October 26, 1994.
According to appellants, the application is a division of
Application 08/121,360, filed September 13, 1993, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,376,418, issued December 27, 1994.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007