Ex parte ROGERS et al. - Page 6




             Appeal No. 96-2625                                                                                   
             Application 08/329,536                                                                               


             transparent, and an adhesive layer (20) on the portion of one                                        
             side of the label which lies substantially outside the central                                       
             portion, and release layer (12) which is removably attached to                                       
             the adhesive layer on the side of the adhesive layer opposite                                        
             the label and which has an opening (22) which exposes an                                             
             adhesive-free central portion of the label (col. 2, lines 33-                                        
             60).  Information is marked on the adhesive-free central                                             
             portion of the label (col. 1, lines 55-59; col. 2, lines 60-                                         
             62).  After the marking, the label is fixed to a surface by                                          
             removing the release layer and pressing the adhesive against                                         
             the surface (col. 1, lines 59-60).  Because the marking is                                           
             disposed between the article and the label, and thereby lies                                         
             underneath the label, the marking is protected from damage                                           
             (col. 1, lines 60-62; col. 3, lines 28-29).                                                          
                    Neither Heatwole nor VanErmen discloses printing on the                                       
             peelable or release layer as required by step c of appellants’                                       
             claim 8, which is the only independent claim.                                                        
                    The examiner argues that “[i]t would have been obvious to                                     
             a person having ordinary skill in the art to have provided                                           
             reverse image printing on the release liner of Heatwole, since                                       
             VanErmen recognizes that reverse image printing on a surface                                         
                                                       -6-6                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007