Appeal No. 96-2640
Application No. 08/068,273
pages 7 and 8 of the answer. Appellant contends that claim 1
is unobvious over Copeland, because Copeland does not disclose
(I) "a lower hollow cylinder defining an interior bore of
constant diameter which receives said upper core with a mating
fit" (claim
13
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007