Ex parte KITOU et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-2661                                                          
          Application 08/177,975                                                      



          group in the briefs.  37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) (July 1, 1995) as                
          amended at                                                                  
          60 Fed. Reg. 14518 (March 17, 1995), which was controlling at               
          the time of Appellants' filing the brief, states:                           
                    For each ground of rejection which appel-                         
                    lant contests and which applies to a group                        
                    of two or more claims, the Board shall                            
                    select a single claim from the group and                          
                    shall decide the appeal as to the ground of                       
                    rejection on the basis of that claim alone                        
                    unless a statement is included that the                           
                    claims of the group do not stand or fall                          
                    together and, in the argument under para-                         
                    graph (c)(8) of this section, appellant                           
                    explains why the claims of the group are                          
                    believed to be separately                                         



                    patentable.  Merely pointing out differ-                          
                    ences in what the claims cover is not an                          
                    argument as to why the claims are sepa-                           
                    rately patentable.                                                
          Appellants have argued claims 17 through 19 as a single group.              
          We will, thereby, consider the Appellants' claims as standing               
          or                                                                          
          falling together and we will treat claim 17 as a representa-                
          tive claim of that group.                                                   


                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007