THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN TSAI, PETER T. TRZASKO, MICHAEL T. PHILBIN,
ROBERT L. BILLMERS, MARTIN M. TESSLER,
JOSEPH A. VAN GOMPEL and MORTON W.
RUTENBERG
__________
Appeal No. 1996-2738
Application 08/252,5011
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ, and ROBINSON, Administrative
Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed June 1, 1994. According to
appellant’s, the application is a division of Application
08/004,161, filed January 11, 1993, now U.S. Patent no.
5,349,089, issued September 20, 1994; which is a division of
Application 07/683,483, filed April 9, 1991, now U.S. Patent
no. 5,227,481, issued July 13, 1993; which is a continuation
of Application 07/516,024, filed April 27, 1990, now
abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/376,779, filed July 7, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007