THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAZUHIRO NODA, KENICHI TAKAHASHI, KOICHI TANAKA and
HARUO WATANABE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2758
Application No. 08/103,7921
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1 through 5, 8, 14, 16, 20 through 24,
27 and 33 through 35, which are all of the claims remaining in
the application. Subsequent to the final Office action dated
1Application for patent filed August 10, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007