THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CARL R. MACKERER, TIMOTHY A. ROY
and GARY R. BLACKBURN
____________
Appeal No. 96-2803
Application No. 08/255,5421
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 21, 22, 26, 27 and 29-33.
1Application for patent filed June 6, 1994. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/976,030, filed November 13, 1992, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007