Ex parte GHOSH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1996-2811                                                        
          Application 08/402,670                                                      


          Appellants’ invention relates to a ceramic guide rail for                   
          guiding photographic film and paper without adverse effects on              
          said photographic film and paper.  Independent claims 1 and 10              
          are representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy               
          of those claims can be found in the Appendix to appellants’                 
          brief.                                                                      


          The prior art references relied upon by the examiner in                     
          rejecting the appealed claims are:                                          
          Chatterjee et al.            5,290,332            Mar.  1,                  
          1994                                                                        
          (Chatterjee ‘332)                                                           
          Ghosh et al.                 5,336,282            Aug.  9,                  
          1994                                                                        
          (Ghosh ‘282)                                                                
          Chatterjee et al.            5,358,913            Oct. 25,                  
          1994                                                                        
          (Chatterjee ‘913)                                                           
          Yoshida et al.                2-187946            Jul. 24,                  
          1990                                                                        
          (Yoshida)                                                                   
          (Japanese Patent)                                                           


          Claims 1 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                    
          as being unpatentable over Ghosh ‘282 or Chatterjee ‘332 or                 
          ‘913 in view of Yoshida.                                                    



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007