Ex parte GHOSH et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1996-2811                                                        
          Application 08/402,670                                                      


          the appealed claims, do more than merely state a purpose or                 
          intended use of the claimed structure, but instead                          
          serve to provide a definition of the invention and give "life               
          and meaning" to the claimed subject matter such that it must                
          therefore be considered as a positive limitation in                         
          determining patentability.  See Corning Glass Works v.                      
          Sumitomo Electric U.S.A. Inc., 868 F.2d 1251, 1257, 9 USPQ2d                
          1962, 1966 (Fed. Cir. 1989) and Diversitech Corp. v. Century                
          Steps Inc., 850 F.2d 675, 7 USPQ2d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 1988).                   


          Since we have concluded that the teachings and                              
          suggestions found in the references applied by the examiner                 
          would not have made the subject matter as a whole of claims 1               
          through 18 on appeal obvious to one of ordinary skill in the                
          art at the time of appellants’ invention, we must refuse to                 
          sustain the examiner’s rejection of those claims under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103.                                                               








                                          9                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007