THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MILIVOJ K. BRUN, KRISHAN L. LUTHRA and RAJ N. SINGH
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2829
Application No. 08/403,3561
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, METZ and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 10 through 12, which are all of the claims pending in
the application. This appeal is related to Appeal No. 95-
1Application for patent filed March 14, 1995. According
to the appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/218,170, filed March 28, 1994, which is a
division of Application No. 08/057,919, filed May 7, 1993,
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/716,444, filed
June 17, 1991, all of which are now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007