Ex parte BRUN et al. - Page 2






          4981, an appeal from the final rejection of claims 10 through               
          16 in Application 08/248,583, which is directed to a method                 
          for forming a fiber reinforced silicon carbide matrix.                      
               Claim 10, the broadest claim in this application, reads                
          as follows:                                                                 
               10.  A fiber reinforced silicon carbide matrix composite               
          comprising at least about 10 volume percent of metal nitride                
          coated fiber and from about 5 to 90 volume percent silicon                  
          carbide, said metal nitride coated fiber consisting                         
          essentially of a silicon carbide fiber, and a metal nitride                 
          coating selected from the group consisting of silicon nitride,              
          titanium nitride, tantalum nitride, zirconium nitride, hafnium              
          nitride, aluminum nitride, niobium nitride, and mixtures                    
          thereof, where said metal nitride first coating is a                        
          continuous coating covering the entire surface of said silicon              
          carbide fiber.                                                              
               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies on the                 
          following prior art:                                                        
          Singh et al. (Singh)     4,889,686                Dec. 26, 1989             
          Borom et al. (Borom)     5,015,540                May  14, 1991             
                                             (filed Jun. 1, 1987)                     
          Rousseau                 5,051,300                Sep. 24, 1991             
                                             (filed Aug. 15,1989)                     
               Claims 10 through 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of either Borom               
          or Singh, and Rousseau.                                                     
               We reverse.                                                            




                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007