Ex parte BLIND et al. - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 16                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                              Ex parte HENRY F. BLIND,                                
                                  DAVID A. DAGE and                                   
                                   ALAN S. PHILIPS                                    
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 96-2871                                   
                              Application 08/352,9641                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    

          THOMAS, HAIRSTON and HECKER, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               


               Application for patent filed December 8, 1994.  According to1                                                                     
          appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 08/103,379,   
          filed August 9, 1993, now abandoned.                                        
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007