Appeal No. 96-2871
Application 08/352,964
are met since 22 is not adjacent to the structural panel 12.
Thus, we will not sustain the 35 U.S.C.
§ 102 rejection of claim 7.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 1 through 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph is affirmed; the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 12 through 15 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102 is affirmed; the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 3, 4, 10 and 11 (which stand or fall with the claims
from which they depend) under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed;
however, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claim 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 102 is reversed.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007