THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte LEE M. E. MORIN
________________
Appeal No. 96-2992
Application 08/200,0491
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 1 through 7, all the
outstanding claims in the case.
The claimed invention relates to a computer-based
device and method for providing spoken translations of a
1 Application for patent filed February 22, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007