Appeal No. 96-2994 Application 08/282,413 ordinary skill in the art. Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1051, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1438 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 (1988); Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Delta Resins & Refractories, Inc., 776 F.2d 281, 293, 227 USPQ 657, 664 (Fed. Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1017 (1986); ACS Hosp. Sys., Inc. v. Montefiore Hosp., 732 F.2d 1572, 1577, 221 USPQ 929, 933 (Fed. Cir. 1984). These showings by the examiner are an essential part of complying with the burden of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness. Note In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992). With respect to independent claims 1 and 14, the examiner cites Corthout as teaching the graphical depiction of a virtual reality environment. The examiner notes that Corthout does not specifically disclose that hidden objects are obscured or that partitions are determined. The examiner asserts that obscuring objects is conventional in flight simulators, and that Bentley teaches that a hierarchic data structure can be viewed as defining partitions. The examiner also asserts that Fuchs teaches the use of partitions as claimed [answer, pages 4-5]. The examiner concludes that it 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007