Appeal No. 96-2994
Application 08/282,413
the rejection of these claims based on these two prior art
documents. In summary, we have not sustained either
of the examiner’s rejections of independent claims 1 and 14.
Therefore, we also do not sustain either rejection of
dependent claims 2-13 and 15-26. Accordingly, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 1-26 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
Gary V. Harkcom )
Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Kenneth W. Hairston )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Jerry Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS/dm
Tammy L Williams
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007