Ex parte RUIGROK et al. - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 1996-3020                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/156,146                                                                                                                                            


                                Appellants’ Request for Reconsideration is treated as a                                                                                                
                     Request for Rehearing in accordance with the revision of 37                                                                                                       
                     CFR                                                                                                                                                               
                     § 1.197(b), effective December 1, 1997.                                                                                                                           
                                Appellants request that we reconsider and modify our                                                                                                   
                     decision dated July 30, 1999 to indicate that the rejection of                                                                                                    
                     claims 17, 18, 20 and 21 is reversed .                                        2                                                                                   
                                Appellants rely on the decision to reverse the rejection                                                                                               
                     of claims 6 through 8, 16, 19 and 22 as the basis to reverse                                                                                                      
                     the rejection of claims 17, 18, 20 and 21.                                                                                                                        
                                Claims 17, 18, 20 and 21 were not treated on their merits                                                                                              
                     by the Board.  These claims were grouped with claims 3, 4 and                                                                                                     
                     13 through 15 which stood together as indicated by Appellants                                                                                                     
                     at page 6 of the brief.  Claim 3 was considered on its merits                                                                                                     
                     as the representative claim.  (Note the Decision at page 4.)                                                                                                      




                                2 Appellants have stated that the Board of Patent Appeals                                                                                              
                     and Interferences has allowed certain claims and Appellants                                                                                                       
                     request we reconsider our decision and allow additional                                                                                                           
                     claims.  We do not allow claims.  The Board of Patent Appeals                                                                                                     
                     and Interferences renders a decision to affirm or reverse a                                                                                                       
                     particular rejection of claims.                                                                                                                                   

                                                                                        -2-                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007