Ex parte RUIGROK et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-3020                                                        
          Application 08/156,146                                                      









               37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) amended March 17, 1995, which was                 
          controlling at the time of Appellants filing the brief,                     
          states:                                                                     
                    For each ground of rejection which                                
                    appellant contests and which applies to a                         
                    group of two or more claims, the Board                            
                    shall select a single claim from the group                        
                    and shall decide the appeal as to the                             
                    ground of rejection on the basis of that                          
                    claim alone unless a statement is included                        
                    that the claims of the group do not stand                         
                    or fall together and, in the argument under                       
                    paragraph (c)(8) of this section, appellant                       
                    explains why the claims of the group are                          
                    believed to be separately patentable.                             
                    Merely pointing out differences in what the                       
                    claims cover is not an argument as to why                         
                    the claims are separately patentable.                             
                                                                                     
               Appellants may argue the merits of claims 17, 18, 20 and               
          21 before the Examiner, noting our decision with respect to                 
          claim 6.                                                                    
               In view of the foregoing, Appellants’ request for                      
          rehearing is granted to the extent that we have in fact                     


                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007