Appeal No. 96-3054
Application 08/134,147
With regard to the rejection of claims 17 and 18
(dependent from claim 15) under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Wong in view of Koskowich and further in
view of Ogawa, we find nothing in Ogawa to supply the elements
missing from Wong and Koskowich as discussed supra. We,
therefore, will not sustain the rejection of claims 17 and 18.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the
Examiner rejecting claims 1 through 7 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. §
112, first paragraph, is affirmed; however, the decision of
the Examiner rejecting claims 19 through 25 under 35 U.S.C. §
112, first
paragraph, and claims 15 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
reversed.
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007