Appeal No. 96-3203 Page 3 Application No. 08/081,984 The following reference is relied upon by the examiner as evidence of anticipation in support of his rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b): German Patent (Heinke) 3 3,203,410 Nov. 25, 1982 Claims 21 through 31, 33 and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Heinke. The Heinke reference discloses a helically coiled wire that is adopted to be placed in a blood vessel for sealing the blood vessel. According to Heinke’s specification, the coiled wire may have a “cylindrical, conical or barrel-shaped form” (translation, pages 3-4). The conical embodiments are shown in Figures 5 and 6 of the Heinke reference. From the examiner’s response to appellants’ arguments on page 6 of the answer, we understand that he relies on the conical embodiment shown in Figure 6 of the Heinke reference. 3A translation of this reference is attached to the examiner’s answer.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007