Ex parte HAMADA - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1996-3281                                                        
          Application 07/895,467                                                      



          § 1.136(a).  See the final rule notice, 54 F.R. 29548 (July                 
          13, 1989), 1105 O.G. 5 (August 1, 1989).                                    
               Effective August 20, 1989, 37 CFR § 1.196(b) has been                  
          amended to provide that a new ground of rejection pursuant to               
          the rule is not considered final for the purpose of judicial                
          review under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141 or 145.                                       
               Failure by Appellant to timely request reconsideration by              
          the Board or to timely seek prosecution before the examiner                 
          with respect to the new rejection as provided for by 37 CFR §               
          1.196(b) will result in the cancellation of all the claims                  
          subject to the new rejection.                                               
                                      REVERSED                                        
                                  37 CFR § 1.196(b)                                   
                                                                                     
                                                                                     



          Lee E. Barrett                          )                                   
               Administrative Patent Judge     )                                      
                    )                                                                 
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                         Michael R. Fleming              ) BOARD OF                   
          PATENT                                                                      
                         Administrative Patent Judge     )   APPEALS AND              
                                                  )  INTERFERENCES                    
                                          12                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007