THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAIMO KIVARI and SEPPO E. SALOW
____________
Appeal No. 96-3372
Application No. 07/823,1531
____________
HEARD: June 11, 1999
____________
Before MARTIN, JERRY SMITH, and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 8-18, which constitute
all the claims remaining in the application. An amendment
1Application for patent filed January 21, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007