THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL J. MILLER
and CLARENCE D. VANDERPOOL
____________
Appeal No. 96-3499
Application No. 08/271,5691
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WINTERS, GARRIS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 4, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed May 26, 1992. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/587,142, filed September 24, 1990, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007