Appeal No. 96-3499 Page 3
Application 08/271,569
Rather than reiterate all of the conflicting viewpoints
advanced by the examiner and the appellants regarding the
above-noted rejection, we make reference to the examiner's
answer and to the appellants' brief for a complete exposition
of the opposing viewpoints expressed by the appellants and the
examiner concerning the above-noted rejection.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007